RCCN WeChat QrCode
Mobile WebSiteThe slogan "Curve Overtaking" was proposed for more than 20 years, but it has been questioned. From the beginning of 2017, the leaders of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology believe that it is more appropriate to change the “turning overtaking” to “changing overtaking”. On May 29th, in the first session of the Longwan Forum, Mr. Wang Binggang, Team Leader of Supervision Project for Major Projects on Electric Vehicles of the Ministry of Science and Technology, put forward his own views on “change lanes and overtaking” and added the concept of “change lanes and overtaking”. . Here, the author proposes that he understands and understands that the dispute between “turning overtaking” and “changing overtaking” is discussing the truth. For peer reference.v
1. What is "Tao"?
"Tao" was proposed by Chinese Laozi. The opening of the Tao Te Ching wrote "Tao Dao, very much." What is "Tao"? Throughout the Tao Te Ching, there is no definition of what Dao is. According to the Tao Dao, Dao is an objective existence but cannot be seen or touched. It is the origin of the world. The "Tao" here is a philosophical concept. Since “Tao” is invisible and intangible, then at the philosophical level, there is no understanding of “turning” or “changing lanes”.
Second, China wants to develop new energy vehicles to bend the "track" of overtaking, what does "road" mean?
Regardless of "turning overtaking" or "changing overtaking," the first step is to find out what "road" is here. If there is no unified understanding and understanding of this "Tao", the discussion that follows will always be "Public say the public, and the grandmother tells her." The society is composed of “public and maternal”, and the opinions of “public and subordinate” must be the same, and the development of the car will be harmonious.
In front of the "track" of "turning overtaking", not the "track" in the "moral of morality", is it the "way" of a car for cars? Obviously not. To "carry over" or "change lanes to overtake," this "track" must be something that can be found and touched. The author believes that the "track" for the development of new energy vehicles can only be specific rules, models, and technical standards.
Third, who is setting the rules, models, and technical standards for the development of new energy vehicles?
Fuel cars, China is latecomers. The pioneers of fuel vehicles are Europe and the United States, and Japan and South Korea are also in front. China's reform and opening up, using the "market for technology" strategy, has not been successful, that is, no exchange of technology. In terms of new energy vehicles, both China and automobile powers are facing new rules. However, Japanese hybrid vehicles have been very successful, and they have also been recognized by the Chinese automobile industry. The United States Tesla's electric vehicles are also very successful, and they are also recognized as heroes in the Chinese automobile industry. Behind it? It is Japan and the United States that have formulated the rules for the development of new energy vehicles, or that Japan and the United States have taken the lead in the development of new energy vehicles.
Fourth, why does China develop "auto" cars?
The "car" to be overtaken here does not mean the "car" in the lane, but the "new car" in China. It means that China's new energy vehicles must surpass those in Europe, America, Japan, and South Korea in terms of quality, performance, and market share. car
With fuel cars, China's backwardness is a reality. If we want to pursue accountability, it has no practical significance. Through reform and opening up, China’s auto industry has achieved significant development, including the development and progress of its own-brand vehicles, and has achieved China’s goal of becoming a major automobile producer and a major consumer nation. However, practice has proved that China has been harder to surpass Europe, the United States, Japan and South Korea in terms of fuel vehicles.
By the same token, if we develop new energy vehicles, China will continue to develop in accordance with the "rules" enacted by Europe, the United States, Japan, and South Korea. The results are also predictable, that is, they will always remain behind.
5. How can China "over" Europe, America, Japan and South Korea in developing new energy vehicles?
Some experts believe that the development basis for the development of new energy vehicles is fuel vehicles. In the phase of fuel vehicles, China does not have certain advantages. On what basis can new energy vehicles be developed beyond Europe and the United States, Japan, and South Korea? Those who hold this view ignore China's objective facts in many fields and have fallen behind the advanced countries when the traditional industry base is quite backward. Therefore, this view need not be refuted. The author's opinion is as follows:
1 Traditional cars, China cannot exceed advanced countries. The main reason is that the rules of the game are set by the automobile powers. These rules of the game have restricted China's development of better fuel vehicles. It is impossible for China to make changes to these game rules. In other words, China does not have any initiative in the rules of traditional car games.
2 New energy vehicles are different. Traditional car powerhouses have not yet dominated the rules of the game, or they cannot dominate the game rules of new energy vehicles.
3 China's development of new energy vehicles is also drawing up some rules of the game. Japan is already taking the lead in developing hybrid power. In this regard, Japan has already formulated the rules for the hybrid car. The U.S. Tesla's pure electric car is a high-end pure electric car. In this regard, the U.S. is also developing special Sira's pure electric car game rules. China is learning from Japan and the United States, but it is also developing rules for pure electric vehicles that are in line with China’s national conditions.
Individuals understand that whether it is overtaking or changing lanes, China must develop its own technical route and develop its own rules in order to develop new energy vehicles.
In the traditional traffic rules, the corners cannot pass. China has proposed the concept of cornering overtaking, which is to change the original rules. The purpose of passing over a curve is to surpass the opponent and gain the dominance of the rules. The initiative to control China's own hands, took the initiative to change lanes.
The opening of the Tao Te Ching wrote "Tao Dao Dao." The "Tao" discussed today is also not an eternal "Tao."
