RCCN WeChat QrCode
Mobile WebSiteRecently, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology released the public announcement on “Preliminary audit of subsidies for the promotion and application of new energy vehicles for 2017 and prior years”. The publicity shows that in 2016 and 2017, new energy auto companies should liquidate the subsidy funds totaling approximately 18.97 billion yuan, of which 12.33 billion yuan in 2016 and 6.64 billion yuan in 2017. In 2017, the number of new energy vehicles announced by enterprises increased by nearly 80% compared with 2016, but after accounting, the liquidation subsidy funds should be only 46% of 2016, and the “shrinkage” is almost half.
According to the announcement, in 2016, there were 512 kinds of vehicle models reported by 86 companies, a total of 51016 vehicles. The enterprise applied for liquidation funds of 1246.313538 million yuan, and the group approved 50,208 vehicles for promotion, with a subsidy of 123,308,724,000 yuan. In 2017, there were 432 vehicle models reported from 87 companies, totaling 230,616 vehicles. Enterprises applied for liquidation funds of 96011,468,370,000 yuan, and the number of promotion approved by the expert group was 161,667, and the amount of subsidies was 664,099.125 million yuan.
In 2016, the average subsidy for each new energy vehicle was 245,000 yuan. By 2017, the average pay for each vehicle was reduced to 41,000 yuan, about one-sixth of the previous year.
According to the 2017 public notice, some of the vehicles failed to be approved, mainly including the following reasons: they did not access the national regulatory platform, the national regulatory platform data did not meet the required mileage, and the mileage was less than 20,000 kilometers. In addition, the registration date of the driving license is before the release date of the recommended catalog, the parameters of the key parts parameters and the recommended catalog are inconsistent, the parameters of the battery unit model and the recommended catalog are inconsistent, the model of the battery pack and the parameters of the manufacturer and the recommended catalog are inconsistent, and are driven. The motor model is inconsistent with the recommended catalog parameters, the company name of the drive motor invoice is inconsistent, and the company has filled out the recommended catalog batch with errors.
